Greetings J-A, On Apr 14, 2013, at 6:10 AM, Jan Anders Andersson <[email protected]> wrote:
> >>> J-A: >>> why should you burn the clay? >> >> Marsha: >> Before (when soft and malleable) and after a firing (when firm), the clay is >> still in a constant state of changing. > > J-A: > Sure, but the important thing about the usefulness, the value, during the > pot's time, is that it is hard enough to keep the content from leaking out of > it. Marsha: A different point-of-view might be that the functioning value of the pot is the empty space inside it. > You sound like that stablity is constantly inferior to change. Marsha: No, I've made no such judgmental statement. > I say that they are even and that all we know about this ever-change is > patterned. I agree that static patterns of value are objects of knowledge that represent what we conventionally know. Hmmm. Can one know what a pattern is not? Marsha Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org/md/archives.html
