Hello everyone On Sun, Apr 28, 2013 at 5:04 AM, e-mail davidint <[email protected]>wrote:
> Hi Dan > > Maybe this will help: > > http://ndpr.nd.edu/news/23797-after-finitude-an-essay-on-the-necessity-of-contingency/ > > > Hi David It might help if you tell me what maybe this will help. This has nothing to do with the MOQ. It seems like a review of a book steeped in subject/object thinking and weird jargon that no reasonable person can be expected to fathom. For instance: "Facticity is the point of departure for gaining access to this absolute: Meillassoux shows that it is not the correlation, but rather the facticity of the correlation, that constitutes the absolute. This entails changing the function facticity has had for correlationism, insofar as it has to be understood not as limiting our knowledge of the absolute, but instead as granting us knowledge of it. In the end, facticity amounts to unveiling the in-itself." Dan comments: Huh? Dan http://www.danglover.com Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org/md/archives.html
