Here's the link: https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?v=10200614071048741
J A 23 apr 2013 kl. 14.12 skrev Jan Anders Andersson: > I think we'd better make them dance like this: Oh my freaking god..Wow wow > wow..This is just amazing > > Jan Anders > > > 20 apr 2013 kl. 10.47 skrev ADRIE KINTZIGER: > >> Robert is talking about parrots,2 parrots in a cage only repeat eachother >> mistakes too often, we have to separate the parrots >> >> >> 2013/4/20 MarshaV <[email protected]> >> >>> >>> dmb, >>> >>> Marsha had said: >>> Can you read? The subject line says 'philosophology'. Read again what >>> Annotation 133 says about philosophology and try to understand RMP's words >>> in that context. Do you understand the word 'context'? >>> >>> dmb whines and tries to change the subject: >>> ... >>> ... snip. >>> ... >>> >>> >>> Marsha now: >>> Don't misrepresent my post; look again at the subject line. RMP states in >>> Annotation 133 from 'LILA's Child: "... I have read that the MOQ is the >>> same as Plato, Aristotle, Plotinus, Hegel, James, Pierce, Nietzsche, >>> Bergson, and many others even though these people are not held to be saying >>> the same as each other. This kind of comparison is what I have meant by the >>> term, "philosophology." It is done by people who are not seeking to >>> understand what is written but only to classify it so that they don't have >>> to see it as any thing new. ..." These are RMP's words. Perhaps you >>> should read them again. RMP, in 'A brief summary of the Metaphysics of >>> Quality', makes a similar statement: >>> >>> "I also have a concern of my own. This is the concern that philosophers, >>> instead of coming to grips with the philosophy at hand, sometimes dismiss >>> it by saying, “Oh he is saying the same as someone else,” or “someone else >>> has said it much better.” This is the latter half of the well known >>> conservative argument that some new idea is (a) no good because it hasn't >>> been heard it before or (b) it is no good because it has been heard before. >>> If, as has been noted by R.C. Zaehner, once the Oxford University Professor >>> of Eastern Religions and Ethics, I am saying the same thing as Aristotle; >>> and if, as has been noted in the Harvard Educational Review, I am saying >>> the same thing as William James; and if as has been noted now that I may be >>> saying the same thing as Spinoza: then why has no one ever noticed that >>> Aristotle and Spinoza and William James are all saying the same thing?" >>> >>> And previously in the same document: >>> >>> "The Metaphysics of Quality's central idea that the world is nothing but >>> value is not part of any philosophic tradition that I know of. I have >>> proposed it because it seems to me that when you look into it carefully it >>> makes more sense than all the other things the world is supposed to be >>> composed of." >>> >>> >>> Marsha >>> >>> >>> >>> Moq_Discuss mailing list >>> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. >>> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org >>> Archives: >>> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ >>> http://moq.org/md/archives.html >>> >> >> >> >> -- >> parser >> Moq_Discuss mailing list >> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. >> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org >> Archives: >> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ >> http://moq.org/md/archives.html > > Moq_Discuss mailing list > Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. > http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org > Archives: > http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ > http://moq.org/md/archives.html Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org/md/archives.html
