Dear Marsha You know from my book that to separate the good from the bad is to check if it saves time or not. If a pattern (of logic contradiction) saves time, it feeds and grow, otherwise it eats and diminish.
How about an unburned piece of clay formed as a teapot, will it save more time than a burned teapot piece of pattern? JAn Anders 8 maj 2013 x kl. 10.31 skrev MarshaV: > > Greetings, > >> dmb: >> Again, the question is only whether or not logical contradictions are bad or >> not. > > Are the? Hmmm. It depends on context. > > ”The problem lies in the fact that Western intellectual history has been > intent upon creating an understanding that is founded upon universal laws, > and, in order to create such universal laws, we have attempted to eliminate > all objects of thought to which such laws do not universal apply. This, > however, is irrational since there obviously are dynamic and holistic objects > of thought to which the laws of thought do not universally apply." > > > http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Book&bookcmd=download&collection_id=4e77b46be4a50e73&writer=rl&return_to=Law+of+thought > > Moq_Discuss mailing list > Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. > http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org > Archives: > http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ > http://moq.org/md/archives.html Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org/md/archives.html
