dmb said:
But seriously, David. I thought your "overall point" was dead and buried long
ago. Sorry, I just think you're making no sense and quite vaguely too. Maybe
you'd like to demonstrate this method of "considering values". Show us how one
looks at Marsha's values apart from the considerations of intellectual
coherence. Use Marsha's favorite salad of words for an example, please. You
know, the one she repeats so often and in which she describes static patterns
as "ever-changing". For the sake of argument, I'll pretend that the
intellectual values (or lack thereof) don't merit consideration while you do
what you're telling me to do. Show me what it is. I honestly can't imagine how
that would actually work.
djh responds:
..."As I keep explaining - I think that it is Marsha's extreme love of *DQ*
which is destroying her ability to appreciate the 'staticness' of intellectual
values.
dmb says:
Sigh.
Yea, Marsha uses her love of DQ to shit on intellectual values. Obviously. And
stating the obvious helps how, exactly? Seriously, David, you cannot possibly
believe that this is news to anyone.
I think this shows that your suggestion is quite worthless. Would you like to
show me something that isn't already in plain sight? Or would you prefer to
continue with the vague and useless platitudes?
Concepts and reality, David. They are two different things. This is the point
you're not getting and you've now painted yourself into the same paralyzing,
anti-intellectual corner. Fair warning; people get stuck in this corner for
years.
Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org/md/archives.html
