dmb said to djh:
Your claim is contradictory nonsense. According to Pirsig and the English 
language, degeneracy is not good.  

djh replied to dmb:

 Anything static is mystically degenerate - but that mystic degeneracy is 
statically good.


dmb says:
Think about it for just a minute, David. If everything is degenerate, then the 
word cannot be used to distinguish anything from anything else. If everything 
is degenerate, then the idea is completely useless in settling any dispute or 
resolving any conflict of values. 

[Ron]
Quite right Dmb, It renders the term meaningless. What is not seen is the flip 
flop in context needed to operate a working
idea of contradictory meaning. Djh is asserting a Hegalian dialectictical 
model. But lets gain a little context of what is actually being
claimed by those asserting the idea that static quality is mysically degenerate.

I think it ties in nicely with what we discussing in regard to Zeno and how 
ancient thinkers arrived at the idea that appearences are false
and illusionary, they are degenerate and secondary from the mystical "one" and 
as you correctly state, this conflicts with Pirsigs
assertions about experience being the source of all meaning. It could be said 
that this is the distinguishing characteristic between
the decided monist , the rationalist and the pluralist, the empricist 
temperment.

The problem is that the explanation seeks to explain the good by dialectical 
anti-thesis by the degenerate, some things are less
degenerate than others. 

I think the consequences are far reaching  and conclude to a very different way 
of thinking about experience.

BUT the assertion that this supports the idea that contradiction lies as the 
center peice of the MoQ and 
therefore if this assertion conflicts and contradicts the remainder of Pirsigs 
works it some how is justified
as supportive of their claims as a consistancy with Pirsigs assertions. DOing 
this throws all accountability
for anything said out the window as consistancy and clarity in meaning are 
abandoned for a call to purity 
and blind faith.

In short by claiming that all static quality is degenerate they are doing 
exactly what the early neoplatonist
christians did.

Ironic huh?

..the very buggers these folk hate with a passion..


...



 
 ....
Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org/md/archives.html

Reply via email to