dmb says: Having the intellectual freedom to express your views does not mean that those views are immune to criticism.
The only reason i am on this forum is because i seek to be critisised on my intellectual idea's The only real critisism i got from dmb was on the subject that i was a person wit a mental history not on the issue i liked to be discussed. dmb says; Nobody is obliged to take you seriously. It's all about the quality of the views in question, right? We'd all like to be taken seriously but that is not a right. It's one of those things that has to be earned, like trust and respect. Well if this is your view why take the effort to reply to me in the first place? If i am just a nutcase to you you could have ignored me from the beginning. could ave saved me a lot of time kind regards Eddo 2013/6/5 david buchanan <[email protected]> > dmb quoted Pirsig: > "We must understand that when a society undermines intellectual freedom > for its own purposes it is absolutely morally bad, but when it represses > biological freedom for its own purposes it is absolutely morally good. > > > Eddo Rats replied: > > A view weeks ago i was trying to express my intellectual freedom here on > my findings about the relationship between SOM and MOQ on invitation of > Ant. The cause of my findings had to do with my experience with Mental > illness in the past and my training as a Elektronics Engineer. This MOQ > forum is a kind of society with its rules for its own purpose. I expected > to be able to discuss my findings on this MOQ forum free as in a free > intellectual playground. In reality I was, instead of having an > intellectual discussion, almost only being attacked on the fact that i am > somebody with a mental illness history and for that reason not to be taken > seriously. What does the MOQ moral hierarcy have to say about this > situation? > > > > dmb says: > Having the intellectual freedom to express your views does not mean that > those views are immune to criticism. Nobody is obliged to take you > seriously. It's all about the quality of the views in question, right? We'd > all like to be taken seriously but that is not a right. It's one of those > things that has to be earned, like trust and respect. > > Please remember that your views struck me as "something a psychotic person > would say" even BEFORE you shared the fact that you have a history of > mental illness. This was no mere insult but, as it turns out, a reasonably > accurate characterization - or at least a very lucky guess. And the fact > that I'm not interested in such views is not a violation of your freedom > but an exercise of my own freedom. > > > > > > Moq_Discuss mailing list > Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. > http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org > Archives: > http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ > http://moq.org/md/archives.html > Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org/md/archives.html
