dmb,

The basic structure of an argument is 

                        A = B
                        B = C
    Therefore,   A = C

Where the premises can be checked, and it can be seen that the conclusion, 
indeed, follows from the premises.  

You bet, dmb, I have no interest in addressing your general and nebulous 
complaints and criticisms. 

 
Marsha



On Aug 7, 2013, at 3:34 PM, david buchanan <[email protected]> wrote:

> Marsha said to dmb:
> I'm not buying your rhetoric. I am at the MD to explore RMP's Metaphysics of 
> Quality and the MoQ's relationship to Buddhism, and the way they play in 
> living my life. I am not here to accept your interpretations, opinions and 
> judgements as Holy Writ.
> 
> 
> Andre replied:
> Then why do that here on a philosophical discussion site committed to the 
> works of Pirsig? You show contempt for the MoQ. You show miserable 
> understanding of Buddhism and place 'my life' in such a way as to be separate 
> from it. As though you and your 'life' are two separate entities.    .... 
> Please explore your life in your own private room somewhere with mirrors on 
> every wall and ceiling. And don't forget the good old tape player.
> 
> 
> All credit to Horse who has been extremely patient with you Lucy because some 
> here are losing their patience. Just for the record, I think you should be 
> ostracized. You do more harm than good.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> dmb says:
> What's really strange about Marsha's response is implication that exploring 
> Pirsig's metaphysics and its relation to Buddhism is somehow distinct from 
> thinking or even opposed to philosophical discussion. 
> 
> She also thinks it's enough to characterize my specific criticisms as 
> rhetoric, opinions, interpretations, judgements and Holy Writ. Like the 
> ignorant blowhards in talk radio, apparently, she thinks that a snarky 
> attitude or mere mockery can be substituted for a proper response. What's 
> most disturbing is her total lack of self-awareness. She doesn't realize that 
> responses like this are just further evidence of her anti-intellectualism, 
> which is the essence of the criticism that she's "not buying". 
> 
> It's like I accused her of cussing too much and now she's using a long string 
> of profanities in her denial. 
> 
> It's like she's a genius at being wrong. 
> 
> Sigh.
> 
> 
>                         
> Moq_Discuss mailing list
> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
> Archives:
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
> http://moq.org/md/archives.html
Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org/md/archives.html

Reply via email to