Marsha said:
Hmmm, dmb, maybe you should let go of Marsha?
Andre:
Maybe you're asking the wrong person?
Marsha:
The important part in mentioning ever-changing processes is that it
agrees with my experience.
Andre:
Agreement with 'my' experience seems to appear now as your
stock-in-trade defence in whisking the ball away Lucy. You also use it
to justify your incoherent, non-sensical ways. The quotes Ron dug up
from you are a small sample of this and give rise to such notions as 'DQ
is no other than sq', the MoQ = Reality, non-recognition of the value of
'latching', and a host of other things already mentioned by various
posters.
There is a huge problem with these but 'agreement with my experience'
settles it for you and no problem is seen.
Ken Wilber made a valuable suggestion re this: it isn't the experience
an sich but THE INTERPRETATION OF THAT EXPERIENCE that leads you to such
confusion. How? By swearing by the social/intellectual convictions you
hold. I do hope you understand the difference between having an
experience and then interpreting that experience???!
Perhaps you should read LILA again and then perhaps a bit of Wilber. Or
even perhaps the basics of your exploration here (MoQ and Buddhism): the
Buddha's Four Noble Truths and the Eightfold Path, the first of which
reads: Right Understanding. (Rahula, What the Buddha Taught)
But, oops, I nearly forgot. You do not accept truth. What the Buddha
taught was just hypothetical, self-opinionated, egotistical drivel.
No, it's YOUR EXPERIENCE that counts!
Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org/md/archives.html
