dmb,
> On Oct 9, 2013, at 5:23 PM, david buchanan <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> But, alas, Marsha thinks DQ can't be the ever-changing flux of experience but
> DQ is nothing, so there is nothing to change ...
RMP states:
"Change is probably the first concept emerging from this Dynamic experience..."
(RMP, 'LILA's Child', Annotation 57)
"... my statement that Dynamic Quality is always affirmative was not a wise
statement, since it constitutes a limitation or partial definition of Dynamic
Quality. Whenever one talks about Dynamic Quality someone else can take
whatever is said and make a static pattern out of it and then dialectically
oppose that pattern. The best answer to the question, “What is Dynamic
Quality?” is the ancient Vedic one——“Not this, not that.”"
(RMP, 'LILA's Child').
Marsha:
I agree with RMP that Dynamic Quality is best addressed as "not this, not
that" - not patterned, not divisible, not knowable, not definable, not bounded,
not differentiated.
Marsha
Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org/md/archives.html
