dmb, To be more precise...
> On Oct 9, 2013, at 5:23 PM, david buchanan <[email protected]> wrote: > > But, alas, Marsha thinks DQ can't be the ever-changing flux of experience but > DQ is nothing, so there is nothing to change ... On Apr 29, 2013, at 3:20 PM, david buchanan claims: "DQ, or reality itself is ever-changing. That's what "dynamic" means." On Sep 26, 2013, at 4:31 PM, david buchanan wrote: "... obviously, because "constant change" is basically the definition of "dynamic"." but RMP states: "Change is probably the first concept emerging from this Dynamic experience..." (RMP, 'LILA's Child', Annotation 57) Dynamic Quality can be thought of as indivisible, unbounded, unpatterned (not this, not that) with no-thing to change. Marsha Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org/md/archives.html
