Andre,

> On Oct 14, 2013, at 3:23 PM, Andre Broersen <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> Marsha to Andre:
> Change the term from 'conventional' to the term 'conditional', and see if 
> that helps. Have you read the MoQ Textbook?
> 
> Andre:
> Ah, you're in the Lucy mode again: my question still stands:
> 'Do you believe that the atomic bombs that dropped on Hiroshima and Nagasaki 
> were illusory?'
> 
> Marsha:
> I am unfamiliar with RMP's use of 'Brahman'. Please explain how this relates 
> to anything?
> 
> Andre:
> I was using the terminology because you are using similar expressions. I did 
> this in an effort to understand, with clarity, your position. Now you are 
> using this against my sought after clarification of your position. You refuse 
> to commit yourself yet again. This is yet another Lucy trick.
> 
> Let me put another question to you (but is closely related):'Do you believe 
> that the Nazis killed 6 million human beings in what is 
> conventionally/conditionally referred to as the holocaust?'

Marsha:
I answered your last question:  The atomic bombs that dropped on Hiroshima and 
Nagasaki  were/are as conditionally real, as "real as rocks and trees".   
That's it.   Bye.



Marsha

 
 
 
Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org/md/archives.html

Reply via email to