Yet, how does RMP state morality can be served?


RMP:
While sustaining biological and social patterns 
Kill all intellectual patterns. 
Kill them completely 
And then follow Dynamic Quality 
And morality will be served. 

... 

"When Phaedrus first went to India he'd wondered why, if this passage of 
enlightenment into pure Dynamic Quality was such a universal reality, did it 
only occur in certain parts of the world and not others? At the time he'd 
thought this was proof that the whole thing was just Oriental religious 
baloney, the equivalent of a magic land called 'heaven' that Westerners go to 
if they are good and get a ticket from the priests. Now he saw that 
enlightenment is distributed in all parts of the world just as the color yellow 
is distributed in all parts of the world, but some cultures accept it and 
others screen out recognition of it."

  (LILA, Chapter 32)





> On Nov 9, 2013, at 2:34 PM, david buchanan <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> "When Socrates Met Phaedrus: Eros in Philosophy," by Simon Critchley, Hans 
> Jonas professor of philosophy at the New School for Social Research in New 
> York.
> 
> 
> http://opinionator.blogs.nytimes.com/2013/11/03/when-socrates-met-phaedrus-eros-in-philosophy/?_r=0
>  
> 
> 
> "The intention of the “Phaedrus”.., as Alexander Nehemas has convincingly 
> suggested, is to inflame philosophical eros in Phaedrus that gives him the 
> ability to distinguish bad rhetoric, of the kinds found in Lysias’s speech 
> and in Socrates’s first speech, from true rhetoric, of the kind found in the 
> second speech and then analyzed in the second half of the dialogue."
> 
> 
> "...The opposite of a self-contradiction, the “Phaedrus” is a performative 
> self-enactment of philosophy.     If eros is a force that shapes the 
> philosopher, then rhetoric is the art by which the philosopher persuades the 
> non-philosopher to assume philosophical eros, to incline their soul towards 
> truth. But to do this does not entail abandoning the art of rhetoric or 
> indeed sophistry, which teaches that art, although it does so falsely. 
> Philosophy uses true rhetoric against false rhetoric.     The subject matter 
> of the “Phaedrus” is rhetoric, true rhetoric. ..."
> 
>                           
> Moq_Discuss mailing list
> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
> Archives:
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
> http://moq.org/md/archives.html
Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org/md/archives.html

Reply via email to