And? Sent from my iPhone
> On Dec 10, 2013, at 3:30 AM, MarshaV <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Ron, > > If you think reading of the monkey trap analogy is enough to verify it as a > fact drawn from experience, we are far from agreement. The monkey trap > analogy is a supposed explanation of value rigidity. I accept it > hypothetically as an apt explanation. > > By the way, here is the dictionary definition I use for hypothetical: > > http://oxforddictionaries.com/definition/american_english/hypothetical?region=us&q=Hypothetical > > > > > Marsha > > --- > > On Dec 9, 2013, at 10:13 PM, X Acto <[email protected]> wrote: > > In the most basic sense, a fact is a verifiable observation or experience, > in contrast with a hypothesis or theory, which is intended > to explain or interpret facts. > > --- > >> Re: [MD] list of cognitive biases >> On Dec 6, 2013, at 8:15 AM, Ron Kulp <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> It is drawn from the experience of >> Reading the pirsig quote , > > --- > >>> Re: [MD] list of cognitive biases >>> On Dec 6, 2013, at 7:12 AM, MarshaV <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> Ron, >>> >>> And? Was the analogy of the monkey with its hand caught in the coconut >>> drawn from any kind of fact that you experienced? How are you defining a >>> fact and is the interpretation of facts subject to cognitive biases (stale, >>> confusing, static, intellectual attachments to the past). I think it best >>> to consider static patterns of value (stuff in the encyclopedia) as >>> hypothetical. Of course the requires paying attention. >>> >>> Marsha > > > > > > > > ___ > > > Moq_Discuss mailing list > Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. > http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org > Archives: > http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ > http://moq.org/md/archives.html Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org/md/archives.html
