Hi Joe, I think of most of your posts as a Rorschach test. It's sometimes fun to respond, but mostly I don't understand your point. "We are suspended in language", and your posts are suspended in your particular idiosyncrasies. Marsha
> On Dec 9, 2013, at 4:05 PM, Joseph Maurer <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi MarshaV, > > Negation, not this not that, cannot locate the reality of dynamic quality. > Reality requires a positive assertion in existence. Reality does not exist > in the throat of negation. I.E., nothing. > > Negation only clears away debris for the understanding of DQ. The reality > of Existence is questioned in the negative duality of SOM, not this not > that!. The reality of indefinable DQ quality is not a negative term. > > DQ an indefinable limit of cognition passes through positive, indefinably > existing reality, creation, not nothing. > > IMHO Joe > > >> On 12/9/13 1:38 AM, "MarshaV" <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> No, I think I will stay with Dynamic Quality as "not this, not that". > > > Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org/md/archives.html
