Intuition, is pre-cognitive process of information selection based on value.

Using the sand sorting analogy from Zen, it is how you choose what sand to sort.

Regards,
Richard

> On 11 Dec 2013, at 12:20, MarshaV <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> 
> 
> Say something about intuition.  
> 
> 
> 
>> On Dec 10, 2013, at 6:40 AM, Richard Skillen <[email protected]> 
>> wrote:
>> 
>> Value rigidity is the unwillingness to change our static constructs from 
>> experience.
>> 
>> I see facts arising from the logical deductions of our experience derived 
>> intuition. Static yet malleable.
>> 
>> Regards,
>> Richard
>> 
>>> On 10 Dec 2013, at 08:30, MarshaV <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Ron,
>>> 
>>> If you think reading of the monkey trap analogy is enough to verify it as a 
>>> fact drawn from experience, we are far from agreement.  The monkey trap 
>>> analogy is a supposed explanation of value rigidity.  I accept it 
>>> hypothetically as an apt explanation.  
>>> 
>>> By the way, here is the dictionary definition I use for hypothetical:
>>> 
>>> http://oxforddictionaries.com/definition/american_english/hypothetical?region=us&q=Hypothetical
>>>  
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Marsha
>>> 
>>> ---
>>> 
>>> On Dec 9, 2013, at 10:13 PM, X Acto <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> 
>>> In the most basic sense, a fact is a verifiable observation or experience, 
>>> in contrast with a hypothesis or theory, which is intended 
>>> to explain or interpret facts.
>>> 
>>> ---
>>> 
>>>> Re: [MD] list of cognitive biases
>>>> On Dec 6, 2013, at 8:15 AM, Ron Kulp <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>> It is drawn from the experience of 
>>>> Reading the pirsig quote ,
>>> 
>>> ---
>>> 
>>>>> Re: [MD] list of cognitive biases
>>>>> On Dec 6, 2013, at 7:12 AM, MarshaV <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>> Ron,
>>>>> 
>>>>> And?  Was the analogy of the monkey with its hand caught in the coconut 
>>>>> drawn from any kind of fact that you experienced?  How are you defining a 
>>>>> fact and is the interpretation of facts subject to cognitive biases 
>>>>> (stale, confusing, static, intellectual attachments to the past).   I 
>>>>> think it best to consider static patterns of value  (stuff in the 
>>>>> encyclopedia) as hypothetical.  Of course the requires paying attention.  
>>>>> 
>>>>> Marsha
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> ___
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Moq_Discuss mailing list
>>> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
>>> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
>>> Archives:
>>> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
>>> http://moq.org/md/archives.html
>> Moq_Discuss mailing list
>> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
>> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
>> Archives:
>> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
>> http://moq.org/md/archives.html
> Moq_Discuss mailing list
> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
> Archives:
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
> http://moq.org/md/archives.html
Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org/md/archives.html

Reply via email to