Ian,
On Fri, Jan 10, 2014 at 1:28 AM, Ian Glendinning <[email protected]>wrote: > Fair enough John, but that was mainly about the Tim / Spam situation - yes? > Yes. > > My "roll-eyes" was specific to the Andre / Joe exchange - and > incidentally was the most polite response I could be bothered to think > of. > > Right. The application of the problem I had to your roll-eyes was one I explicitly made. > The limits of whacky / playful / neurotic tolerance are simply > pragmatic - you can only care so much, eventually someone has to wash > some pots. Well I feel I can sense when people are sincerely engaged in discourse to clarify understanding and when they just got them an egoistic axe to grind. But as Platt always said, I could be wrong. John Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org/md/archives.html
