Hi Andre Sorry about your inconvenience but MALC is my 400 pages comment to ZAMM and Lila. I just happen to mention the mystic behind the number 42 in it, too. But my solution to that is to add Quality to it which makes it 43. :-) Which is what I think RMP would suggest. i e "How can Quality be included in a pedagogical view?"
Today I'm following MD mostly on my iphone and sometimed it cut and copy in an unexpected manner. Is it Quality or is it NSA? Jan-Anders > 29 jan 2014 kl. 22:32 skrev Andre <[email protected]>: > > Jan Anders: > That was the reason for me to write "Money and the Art.." because I thought > that if the MOQ perspective will be able to compete with SOM, there must be > economically superior to SOM. > > Andre: > Hi Jan-Anders. With all due respect, when will you stop plugging your book on > this discuss? We are here discussing the metaphysics of Pirsig and not its > economically superior or inferior status. > > Also, when will you learn to cut and paste? > > Sorry but every post you have written since its publication contains a > reference to your book. I'd rather see a decent post. > Moq_Discuss mailing list > Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. > http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org > Archives: > http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ > http://moq.org/md/archives.html Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org/md/archives.html
