just wandering around the net, I came across an interesting
site.<http://travisherche.com/2014/02/07/guest-post-top-5-things-i-had-to-unlearn-after-debate/>
It was all about technique. Technique is a good thing, right?  They had a
guest speaker section and I happened upon this girl's debate advice and I
thought I'd pass it on to y'all.  Something about her message really pisses
me off and makes me want to debate her like mad.  Guess what it is and win
a prize.

And for bonus points, tell me how this relates to the MoQ and Quality; in
thought and expression.

-----

I hadn't been warned about how many habits I had to unlearn after I
graduated from high school and speech and debate competition, though. This
list can also be read as top strategies for debaters if you're still
competing, because within competition, they work great. In fact, they're
not bad things, because they're helping you learn and grow as a debater.
Here's a few of the more dramatic ones:
1. Never concede an argument.

Some debaters read this title and immediately discredited me: of course
it's okay to concede an argument, especially if it helps you win the round!
No, I'm talking about losing the whole round. Proverbially, because rounds
don't exist in real life. When I started having conversations with fellow
students in college, going deeper spiritually than my Apologetics cards
could ever take me, and discussing controversial topics, I realized I
couldn't admit when a point was a good one. Until I learned to be honest
and allow some give-and-take into my conversations (that is, I was making
it an option that I was wrong), people grew very frustrated with me. The
reason we don't forfeit our debate rounds while we're competing is because
it ruins the whole experience. There are times to learn to defend your
case, and arguing both sides of an issue will help you to find out when.
Build on that knowledge outside the round, and concede points in
conversation.
2. Never ask questions you don't know the answer to.

If you plan on being a lawyer, this advice for cross-examination will carry
well into your life experience beyond high school. For the rest of us,
though, this strategy will make it very difficult to make any friends. It
was an excellent strategy for constructing questions for CX, and I once
coached a student to win her next tournament after one coaching session
emphasizing CX. I struggled with this when I started college, because I was
often afraid of being caught off-guard. One of my journalism instructors
gave me a new strategy, one I used to build upon my past experience:
embrace ignorance, because it helps you learn to ask all the most
interesting questions. Even lawyers and debaters have to admit to not
knowing a detail of the case while they're preparing. The difference, I
found, was every conversation and interview I had could be full of
questions I didn't know the answer to. It satisfied my curiosity and gave
me many more interesting stories.
3. Convince the judge, not your opponent.

I didn't realize how much of a habit I'd made this until I started
volunteering for Justice For All during my second year of college.
Convincing the audience is a fantastic base strategy, and I still use it
when I'm conducting an online discussion. Bill Nye was well aware of his
additional online audience in his recent debate with Ken Ham because he
knew this tactic. There are times, however, to convince the individual.
This takes a completely different set of skills, some of them entirely
reversed. It involves genuine listening, a demeanor that makes the person
you're trying to convince feel smart and loved, and of communicating so
there's no misunderstanding. Learning to convince people to reconsider
controversial issues one-on-one was an entirely different challenge
compared to convincing a judge or audience, but I had to unlearn it. This
gave me two different skills, and helped me grow as a persuasive
communicator.
4. Listen calculatively.

This one is a necessity in successful debate. Before I got anywhere near
running from one end of the room to the other to pick up five or six
trophies at one tournament, I had to develop the skill of doing a
half-dozen things at once. I had to listen, think about what I was going to
say next, write down each point in an organized manner, dig through my
evidence binders, and stay conscious of the time I had left. This was such
a strong habit once I got out of high school, I realized how many people
without speech and debate background are also calculative listeners. A
majority of people are waiting for the other person to stop talking so they
can say something. Learning to listen, and just hear what the other person
was saying as a story, or expression, or shared observation, made me more
appreciative of the people around me. I needed this skill to develop quick
thinking, so I certainly recommend it, but I needed to learn to listen with
sincerity instead of thinking ahead.
5. Value polished appearance over honesty.

Vulnerability is being consistently proven in psychological studies to be
seen as courageous and necessary to developing healthy relationships.
Speech and debate taught me to be aware I was always being watched. Early
in my debate training, I remember being warned about parking-lot judges. If
I snapped at a sibling when we arrived in our van on the morning of the
first day, someone who would judge me later might see me and have a bias
against me before the round began. This was good advice because nobody
should be snapping at their siblings anyway, but I had to learn that
appearances weren't everything. When I graduated, I realized how much more
impactful it was to be vulnerable about my own failures and doubts.
Polished appearance has its place and is a skill I call upon every time I
get out my old suit for a job interview. I needed to unlearn it as I got
older.

Now, for the people who have been out of speech and debate for a while, as
I have, but haven't unlearned the above five strategies, I have something
to say: Grow up.
Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org/md/archives.html

Reply via email to