John said to Dan: 
...you can't have a culture, without individuals. Any more than you can have 
any social pattern without biological being and support.  An ongoing matter of 
discussion, the way the levels interact.   Platt has hung his hat on the idea 
that the 4th level is the Individual level and I think the point could be made 
that pure intellect is pure individualism.

dmb says:
Oh, you're getting this idea from Platt. It's a wrench in the gears for anyone 
trying to sort out the levels and it's not true, according to developmental 
psychologists and philosophers. Individuality is an achievement of development 
and nobody gets there without first being a social creature. So that Ayn 
Randian, Maggie Thatcher idea that there is no such thing as society, only 
individuals, is a very unsound idea. It's a common-sense notion but it's not 
right. It also happens to be one of those old-fashioned ideas that political 
conservatives depend upon and fiercely defend. In many, many polemical rants, 
the conservative pits the individualism against the various forms of socialism 
or liberalism, which are characterized as "collectivist" ideologies. Please 
notice how this reverses Pirsig's descriptions so that programs for 
intellectual control are now painted as the enemy and the old social values are 
thereby protected from egghead interference. 

Sigh. But you're not going to absorb a word of that, are you John? I guess 
"individuality' means you don't really care what other people think and ideas 
just mean whatever you want them to mean. 



                                          
Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org/md/archives.html

Reply via email to