Ant McWatt stated to John McConnell, March 4th 2014: ...to address your substantive point, do keep in mind that any values statement based on the MOQ will also be guided by Dynamic Quality as well as intellectual values (which, as I said in my earlier MD post) are considered as "real" as any other static pattern. The latter point is important to keep in mind because then these intellectual values are not just seen as purely subjective (as found in SOM) and therefore relatively unimportant (or something just for a "PR" exercise) but something to genuinely guide every person at every level in an organization (whether that be a church, corporation, residents association, university or charity) at every level AND at every moment! Apologies if my last MD post about this subject didn't make that clear! (I must admit I don't think it did unfortunately). DMB then noted March 4th: Exactly. Thank you.
The MOQ says that intellectual values are as real as rocks and trees. And these values are placed at the top of the moral hierarchy precisely because they are more Dynamic, more open to change, than are the other categories of static values. This is even more true when SOM (the genetic defect in intellect) is rejected in favor of the MOQ's root expansion rationality. Ant McWatt comments: And thank you Dave. I couldn't have said the latter point better myself! Ant . Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org/md/archives.html
