dmb, dmb says: > My critical engagement with what you're saying shows that your complaint > is baseless. You just don't want to hear it. Apparently, you just cannot > entertain any doubts about what you're regardless of what anyone says about > it. >
Jc: This needs a bit of editing dude, before I can respond. But don't be embarrassed, we all get in a mood where we type too fast sometimes. > And apparently you are capable of considering what I'm saying. thanks for noticing. > Instead you want to do battle with some straw man, one who thinks that > anti-theism in itself, IS a sound basis to build a constructive philosophy. > I find it hard to believe that anyone holds that position. It's so extreme > and silly that it can't be anything other than a ridiculous fiction. It > only shows that you're not to be taken seriously. > > Of course I agree that anti-theism itself is nothing but an attitude and you can't make a philosophy out of an attitude. But you can take that attitude and let it warp your philosophy beyond reason - just ask Ayn Rand. However in this case, I think it's warping your criticism of me. I'm not anti-theistic, therefore I'm an ignorant, book-burning, conservative-minded yahoo. This is what has come across so far in our dialogue. I'd like to correct that. John Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org/md/archives.html
