Thanks Ian, But maybe Arlo is right. Maybe if we'd just drop the divisive terminology, we wouldn't have all the conflicts we have. So let's ignore, "male-brain/female-brain" or "day/night" or "yes/no" and call it all Quality!
Down with differentiation! Quality is all! Quality, Quality. On 5/30/14, Ian Glendinning <[email protected]> wrote: > Thought so ... in here JC says > > "bio-reductionism is seeing higher patterns as caused (dictated) by the > lower. I don't see things that way." > > Me too. But lower patterns do support and static-latch higher patterns > in true Pirsigian style. Bio supports socio-intellectual. > > (Just DMB being the straw-man creator as usual, in order to impugn > individuals.) > > Arlo, you are misguided if you think that one article says "left / > right brainedness" is just a figure of speech. The most publicised > recent work comes from Iain McGilchrist "Master and Emmisary". Linked > many times on MD. > > None of these things are determisitic, the physical brain is very > plastic too (as JC's personal story illustrates, but there's plenty > out there too). Even male / female brain traits incidentally - not > deterministic, but real and relevant. > > Ian > Moq_Discuss mailing list > Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. > http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org > Archives: > http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ > http://moq.org/md/archives.html > -- "finite players play within boundaries. Infinite players play *with* boundaries." Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org/md/archives.html
