[John]
Well clearly I was being ironic.  I don't think that differentiaion is bad. 

[Arlo]
Who said "differentiation is bad"? What you're doing is the reductio ad 
absurdum, by suggesting that because Pirsig sought to fuse classical and 
romantic modes of thinking (the result of SOM) into one, that ALL forms of 
difference (e.g. you suggested "night and day" and "male and female") are 
useless.


[John]
Just to be clear, Arlo, are you saying the concept "art" ought to be eliminated?

[Arlo]
"Art" is high-quality endeavor. I've said this repeatedly. Why would you 
suggest I want to "eliminate" the concept? "Art" suffers under the 
classic/romantic schism, and, like Pirsig, I hold that uniting these RESCUES 
'art'.

[John]
You think that would make everybody more artistic in their academic and and 
economic production?

[Arlo]
Like Pirsig, I think expanding the concept of "art" to apply equally to 
motorcycle repair and painting make all forms of human activity potentially 
better. Yes, I think both academics and business professionals benefit from an 
understanding that unites (classical) 'science' and (romantic) 'art'.

[John]
You really think it would help us if we just eliminated all art classed, and 
then remove the name so we won't miss it?

[Arlo]
Again, this is absurd. But, on the level of terminology, why not rename 'art 
classes' to just say the activity? "Painting 101", "An Introduction to 
Sculpture", "Music in the Middle Ages". Then we could have classes like "The 
Art of Painting", "The Art of Rhetoric", "The Art of Rationality", "The Art of 
Motorcycle Repair". 

But, here, I suggest you read Doorly. And Ant has already given you Doorly's 
way of approaching the terminology.

[John]
Since sculpture is the same as rotisserie assembly and motorcycle maintenance, 
then we don't need separate terms so lets just call it all what it is.

[Arlo]
Sculpting with clay, assembling a rotisserie, and repairing a motorcycle 
require both domain specific knowledge and an awareness that the patterns you 
are working on are in harmony with yourself and everything else. You continue 
to suggest that by uniting classical and romantic separations that anyone can 
do anything. Expertise derives from care, which derives from both an 
understanding of the historically accumulated knowledge on that activity AND an 
appreciation/awareness of immediate Quality. In LILA terms, you need BOTH 
static and Dynamic Quality. 

Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org/md/archives.html

Reply via email to