On Mon, Jun 2, 2014 at 6:10 PM, ARLO JAMES BENSINGER JR <[email protected]> wrote: > [Ian] > Clearly short-hand naming of groups can be misused... > > [Arlo] > Clearly.
[IG] Ha - irony bypass there. > > [Ian] > ... different people have different propensities to mental styles that use > the different halves. > > [Arlo] > No. The research says exactly otherwise. [IG] Evidence - ready when you are. [Arlo] The research says specifically that 'mental styles' ARE NOT lateralized. I understand this will take some time before pop-psychologists and self-help gurus are able to accept the research, but its embarrassing to see this repeated here over and over. > [IG] As you say - it's embarassing to to see this out-of- fashionable crap repeated. Just gain-saying is not evidence or argument Arlo, and you know it. You seem to have missed a whole cycle of evidence and thought Arlo. As several of the references have said it became poisonous for sometime to talk in left/right terms because so much pop-crap was indeed based on it. But knowledge moves on. The neuro-physiological mechanisms - that enable (and more accurately inhibit in a controlled way) - the "talk" between the two halves are increasingly understood. Neither side has a monopoly on what's modelled. but the processed that depend on both halves are affected by how the two halves interact. Please address some of the sources provided. Haidt, McGilchrist, Kahneman, etc ... ... rather than branding them with ad-hominem attacks based on straw-men. Ian Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org/md/archives.html
