> On Jul 22, 2014, at 7:42 PM, Ant McWatt <[email protected]> wrote: > > This is going to lose some people here (and no doubt elsewhere!) but one of > the primary reasons that the MOQ can be so difficult to pin down for a > traditional Western intellectual is its basis on the logic of the Tetralemma, > the four pronged logic that East Asian philosophies (certainly Buddhist and > Taoist traditions) use rather than the syllogistic logic of Aristotle's which > is used by nearly every Western philosopher that you can read today. The > latter are still largely unaware that East Asian logic can operate in two > contradictory contexts while syllogistic logic can operate (or presumes) that > there is only one. I guess you call the latter "the world of everyday > affairs" and is what all the static quality patterns in the MOQ refer to.
Ron: I disagree, I maintain that The basis of MOQ Rests on the idea " that which does Not have value, does not exist" Which I believe corresponds with Aristotle, "the question does not lay Apon whether or not something is or Is not, rather, it rests on whether or not it has meaning" Pragmatically speaking. Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org/md/archives.html
