Arlo, I didn't get the idea from Bo. He certainly does not agree with my query. I did discuss it with him, maybe that's where he got the terms which made you think I derived my idea from him.
But I didn't. John On Fri, Aug 22, 2014 at 2:27 PM, ARLO JAMES BENSINGER JR <[email protected]> wrote: > [Horse to JC] > No it's not - religion is a social pattern, not the Social level. Don't be > silly! > > [Arlo] > Of course its a very sophomoric idea. And here's the context behind it. Bo > (who apparently still monitors MD) sent me an email that read, in part, > "About "religion" as the social definition is something John has from me, > but he omitted my reservations and qualifications." > > So now you know where this is originating. Whatever other deductions you > make from this are up to you. > > Moq_Discuss mailing list > Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. > http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org > Archives: > http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ > http://moq.org/md/archives.html > -- "finite players play within boundaries. Infinite players play *with* boundaries." Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org/md/archives.html
