Hi there John and Andre Humour is one of the highest Values, (which maybe explains why dope smokers got so funny faces:).
But anyone of you still can't hit one of these DEEP values with a stick nor talk to the stick. Aint that peculiar? Jan-Anders > 4 sep 2014 kl. 19:13 Andre Broersen <[email protected]> wrote: > > John to Andre: > Your words are absolutely clear, Andre. I can see right through them. To > the exact wording that Pirsig used and while I have to give you an "A" for > scholarly accuracy, If that's all there is to your MOQ then I’m afraid you’ve > missed the whole point. > > Andre: > You’re right John and I apologize for not recognizing your profound intellect > and ¨deep value” understanding of Pirsig’s MOQ. > > John: > All can be seen in a religious context, if you think of religion as it truly > is - the sharing of deep value. > > Andre: > Yes John…you’ve opened my mind (or is it heart?)… sharing of ¨deep value”. > Gosh, I wished I’d have come up with that one. It is sooooo profound. So that > is REALLY what Pirsig means by the social level. Wow! I mean, I’ve heard of > low value and high value but DEEP value. This really adds to my understanding > of the MOQ. Thank you John, thank you. > > John: > You can narrow it down to human society, and it still has wide scope - > football, economics, academic associations, rotary club minutes, etc, etc. > What would you call a single term that encompassed all that territory, if not > of wide scope? > > Andre: > Yes John…wide scope. Instead of merely suggesting ¨social level” Pirsig > should have said religious level as this would have included everything. But > YOU thought of it John. Fantastic! Your genius has hit on something profound > and put Pirsig to shame! > > John: > You've made your point perfectly and I smell your pain. You think the MOQ > experience can be confined to words and exact definitions. You are sadly > lost, my friend. And I doubt I can help you. I know the way out of the dark > wood you're in, but you don't like or trust me. There's not much I can say. > > Andre: > Again profound John. Now you think you can master the art of mind reading as > well. I have one word for that: brilliant. > > Andre previously: >> A good definition does not narrow the context?it broadens it John. > > John: > You've crossed the line to the irrational now. I got nothing to say to > de-constructive nihilists. > > Andre: > ¨Good is a noun. That was it. That was what Phaedrus had been looking for. > That was the homer, over the fence, that ended the ball game… if you had to > reduce the whole Metaphysics of Quality to a single sentence, that would be > it” . ( The Dakota Indian considers goodness to be a noun rather than an > adjective) (LILA p 418). > > John in response to Andre’s just capture the MOQ [ and all is said]: > And here we are, less than 50 years latter, Andre-Buchanan can utter the same > idea, dressed in an "MOQ" blanket, and nobody on this forum but I can see the > great error, the huge mistake that is. > > Andre: > John, you are proving your brilliance once again. Do you feel lonely John? I > mean, you’re intellectual circumference has not been equalled on this site > and, as you mentioned earlier the people you talk with do not comprehend what > you say when talking MOQ so you talk SOM. It must be lonely at the top > John…come on…show some human frailty. > > John: > A statement that violates the very heart and spirit of the MoQ, That any sort > of static pattern holds the keys on "all there is to say”. > > Andre: > You are assuming that the word ¨capture” denotes ¨all there is to say”. > Actually there is very little to say John but you know that already. > > John: > "In the area of Religion, the rational relationship of Quality to the Godhead > needs to be more thoroughly established, and this I hope to do much later on.” > > Andre: > I can’t wait John. Am so looking forward to your brilliant insights. Can’t > you give us a preview? > > John: > And I'm sorry to embarrass you so. Its bound to happen when we all get > thrown together in one group, the idiots and smart-asses in one place. I > can't help it that I uncover your shame. It's just my nature to be honest. > > Andre: > And honesty is a virtue John…and you display it over and over. You are the > smart ass and I am the idiot. You are soooo profound. I love you John. > > Moq_Discuss mailing list > Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. > http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org > Archives: > http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ > http://moq.org/md/archives.html Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org/md/archives.html
