Jonathan, in a nutshell:
Things only exist where statements of their nature can be true and
consistent, either as a variety of the good or (perhaps) in some higher
(logically necessary) fashion. If that counts as a non-ontology of truth,
then I'm a vogon's grandmother.
BTW RE:
>> it just so happens
>> that the square-circle isn't one of them [THAT EXIST]. Mainly because it
ain't square,
>> and it ain't circular. . . .
JONATHAN:
> But the concept exists and can be addressed. In fact one might hypothesize
> that an infinitely small square is in fact circular.
ELEPHANT:
This is piffle.
Sorry to point that out in such terms, but the shorter I am with you, the
shorter will be the momenatary lapse in your reason.
Elephant.
MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
Mail Archive - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
MD Queries - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html
