Marc wrote > The good part of LC in my opinion is that it can be the Static Intellectual > Pattern, like Pirsig wrote. > Yes, LC is quite dull, as are most intellectual Scientific Books. It doesn't > matter. > Even Jimi Hendrix would not be able to explain E=MC2 well and also make it > artistically Dynamic. Different kind of qualities, you know. Oh how I disagree! Have you read Richard Dawkins on evolution? Steven Pinker on the workings of the mind? How about David Deutsh's explanation of wave-light duality "Shadows"? It's one of the most beautiful pieces of writing I've ever read. Perfectly scientific and perfectly artistic at the same time. Diana MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org Mail Archive - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/ MD Queries - [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at: http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html
- Re: MD An Introduction to the Metaphysics of Quality Zac0351
- Re: MD An Introduction to the Metaphysics of Quality Dan Glover
- Re: MD An Introduction to the Metaphysics of Quality RISKYBIZ9
- Re: MD An Introduction to the Metaphysics of Quality Dan Glover
- RE: MD An Introduction to the Metaphysics of Quali... diana
- RE: MD An Introduction to the Metaphysics of Quali... Marc Brookhuis
- Re: MD An Introduction to the Metaphysics of Q... diana
- Re: MD An Introduction to the Metaphysics ... Jon Joseph Pelle
- RE: MD An Introduction to the Metaphysics ... Marc Brookhuis
- RE: MD An Introduction to the Metaphys... diana
- RE: MD An Introduction to the Met... Marc Brookhuis
- Re: MD An Introduction to the Metaphysics of Quality RISKYBIZ9
- RE: MD An Introduction to the Metaphysics of Quality Dan Glover
- Re: MD An Introduction to the Metaphysics of Quali... Jonathan B. Marder
- Re: MD An Introduction to the Metaphysics of Quali... Jonathan B. Marder
- Re: MD An Introduction to the Metaphysics of Quality Dan Glover
