Wim
Nusselder and all,
Wim Nusselder
wrote:
> Analogous to that, I think that
experiencing DQ may be fun for the drug user, but is not relevant for the world
at large. It
> can't latch onto a (new) static
pattern of value, because it is
forced on the user without any context of social and
> intellectual patterns that get the credit
for the fun and can be induced to migrate (to
partly break up and change for the
> better). Use of peyote in the Native
American church is a different thing, for it has such a context of
social and intellectual
> patterns.
A
couple of questions:
Don't
you think that those of us from a Western culture should be free to modify that
culture to suit our needs?
Would
you call the current US government's "War on Drugs" not relevant to the world at
large?
Would
you say that Psychedelic music was not a static pattern of
value?
Wim
Nusselder:
> Why use drugs? If what I experience is real
and if it is possible to experience it also in more culturally acceptable ways
> (even if they are more difficult), these
other ways are better, because they enable me to convince others (and
myself)
> that my experience is veracious and worthy
of application.
Do
you think it reasonable to compare two experiences, one of which you know
admit to never having experienced? Smiles,
AreteLaugh |
- MD mescaline david wilkinson
- Re: MD More lasting approache... Thracian Bard
- Re: MD mescaline and movies Matt the Amazing Technicolor Dream Coat
- Re: MD mescaline HisSheedness
- Re: MD The I Ching in day... Thracian Bard
- Re: MD mescaline Enliten3
- Re: MD mescaline Wim Nusselder
- Re: MD mescaline N. Glen Dickey
- Re: MD mescaline HisSheedness
- Re: MD mescaline Enliten3
- Re: MD mescaline Andi Norby
- Re: MD mescaline HisSheedness
- Re: MD mescaline Andi Norby
- Re: MD mescaline Wim Nusselder
- RE: MD mescaline N. Glen Dickey
- Re: MD mescaline HisSheedness
- Re: MD mescaline Brian Taylor
- Re: MD mescaline Gerhard Ersdal