Jonathan wrote: > Marco, in energetic terms, "closed" means that their is no input our output of > energy. There is no reason the system can't go on expanding in space. > What I would like to find out is *why* it is considered that there is no input of energy; or, to be more precise, why such a possibility is precluded. My suspicion is that this is a basic axiom of the physical understanding of the cosmos (and completely reasonable in those terms) but not necessarily one that is possible to be argued for (what would count as evidence for it?). Or am I barking up the wrong tree? Sam MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org Mail Archive - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/ MD Queries - [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at: http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html
- Re: MD Religion/God ~ MoQ/DQ Wim Nusselder
- Re: MD Religion/God ~ MoQ/DQ Wim Nusselder
- Re: MD Religion/God ~ MoQ/DQ John Beasley
- Re: MD Religion/God ~ MoQ/DQ Wim Nusselder
- RE: MD Religion/God ~ MoQ/DQ Stephen Devlin
- Re: MD Religion/God ~ MoQ/DQ Jonathan B. Marder
- Re: MD Religion/God ~ MoQ/DQ Elizaphanian
- Re: MD Religion/God ~ MoQ/DQ Jonathan B. Marder
- Re: MD Religion/God ~ MoQ/DQ Marco
- Re: MD Religion/God ~ MoQ/DQ Jonathan B. Marder
- Re: MD Religion/God ~ MoQ/DQ Elizaphanian
- Re: MD Religion/God ~ MoQ/DQ Jonathan B. Marder
- Re: MD Religion/God ~ MoQ/DQ Platt Holden
- Re: MD Religion/God ~ MoQ/DQ Elizaphanian
- Re: MD Religion/God ~ MoQ/DQ Jonathan B. Marder
- Re: MD Religion/God ~ MoQ/DQ Elizaphanian
- Re: MD Religion/God ~ MoQ/DQ Platt Holden
- Re: MD Religion/God ~ MoQ/DQ Jonathan B. Marder
- Re: MD Religion/God ~ MoQ/DQ 3dwavedave
- Re: MD Religion/God ~ MoQ/DQ Platt Holden
- RE: MD Religion/God ~ MoQ/DQ Stephen Devlin