A quick response to Jonathan: > So when SAM says: > > I have a *lot* of sympathy with this. > > I'm not surprised, but would be delighted if he agrees also out of a > "religious" perspective. > What do you say Sam? I say that I DO agree from a staunchly religious perspective, but to spell out exactly why will take quite a long time. I think perhaps I should go away and write it up as a paper (which would then respond to your other points, especially the division between nature and supernature). Cheers Sam MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org Mail Archive - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/ MD Queries - [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at: http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html
- Re: MD Religion/God ~ MoQ/DQ Jonathan B. Marder
- Re: MD Religion/God ~ MoQ/DQ Elizaphanian
- Re: MD Religion/God ~ MoQ/DQ Jonathan B. Marder
- Re: MD Religion/God ~ MoQ/DQ Marco
- Re: MD Religion/God ~ MoQ/DQ Jonathan B. Marder
- Re: MD Religion/God ~ MoQ/DQ Elizaphanian
- Re: MD Religion/God ~ MoQ/DQ Jonathan B. Marder
- Re: MD Religion/God ~ MoQ/DQ Platt Holden
- Re: MD Religion/God ~ MoQ/DQ Elizaphanian
- Re: MD Religion/God ~ MoQ/DQ Jonathan B. Marder
- Re: MD Religion/God ~ MoQ/DQ Elizaphanian
- Re: MD Religion/God ~ MoQ/DQ Platt Holden
- Re: MD Religion/God ~ MoQ/DQ Jonathan B. Marder
- Re: MD Religion/God ~ MoQ/DQ 3dwavedave
- Re: MD Religion/God ~ MoQ/DQ Platt Holden
- RE: MD Religion/God ~ MoQ/DQ Stephen Devlin
- Re: MD Religion/God ~ MoQ/DQ HisSheedness
- RE: MD Religion/God ~ MoQ/DQ Stephen Devlin
- Re: MD Religion/God ~ MoQ/DQ John Beasley
- Re: MD Religion/God ~ MoQ/DQ Wim Nusselder
- Re: MD Religion/God ~ MoQ/DQ Andi Norby