[Micah] > Nothing can be shown to exist independent of humans. This statement is ambiguous; it can mean either: a) If anything exists independent of humans, its existence can't be shown b) If anything exists, its existence can't be shown independent of humans
[Case] > Following the line of thinking you suggest, you have no business > talking about what other humans or Man in the plural experiences. You are > advocating some weird brand of solipsism. What is the argument for this claim? E.g.,: 1) Nothing can be shown to exist independent of humans 2) No other humans can be shown to exist independent of me 3) :. Nothing can be shown to exist independent of me Even if 1) - 3) is a valid argument; 2) does not follow from 1). Craig moq_discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
