[Case] > are you defending Micah here or is there a point of your own you would like > to make? > Because if there is a point of your own in here some place maybe you could > start over and we could > discuss it.
Both. I don't see the point of starting over, but if it makes it easier for you, I will. [Micah] > Nothing can be shown to exist independent of humans. [Case] > You [Micah] are advocating some weird brand of solipsism. [Case] > Micah's statement is a tautology in its own right. Case, My point: your position is that Micah's statement is tautological & advocates solipsism. If you--finding it tautological--agree with Micah's statement, how do you avoid advocating solipsism? Craig moq_discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
