Quoting Matt poot <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Poot: Their science is not based on consensus but there is consensus of > professional opinion in relation to facts gathered. under controlled > conditions? Can you tell me how ice core samples can be properly examined > in anything but precisely controlled conditions? How are atmospheric > measurements supposed to prove anything other than they do? > > please provide further evidence to support your claim please.
If you are really interested in opposing views to global warming I suggest you visit: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_scientists_opposing_global_warming_consensus For further study, read "State of Fear" by Michael Crichton and the "Politically Incorrect Guide to Global Warming" by Christopher Horner. Also, you might want to read "How to Lie with Statistics" by Darell Huff and Irving Geis. Reviewing all sides of a controversial question before coming to a conclusion is desirable don't you think? ------------------------------------------------- This mail sent through IMP: http://horde.org/imp/ moq_discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
