At 11:58 AM 2/15/2007, SA wrote: > Many are very familiar with this quote in Lila >(Ch. 5): > > "Quality is indivisible, undefinable and >unknowable in the sense that there is a knower and a >known, but a metaphysics can be none of these things. >A metaphysics must be divisible, definable and >knowable, or there isn't any metaphysics. Since a >metaphysics is essentially a kind of dialectical >definition and since Quality is essentially outside >definition, this means that a 'Metaphysics of Quality' >is essentially a contradiction in terms, a logical >absurdity."
Don't you think that is perfect? > Isn't static quality, though, the Metaphysics of >the MoQ, and dynamic quality is the Quality of the >MoQ? Unless you would like me to respond with a quote from 'Alice in Wonderland', I think I'll just be quiet. Marsha, Marsha, Marsha moq_discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
