[SA quoted previously]
> > Many are very familiar with this quote in
> Lila
> >(Ch. 5):
> >
> > "Quality is indivisible, undefinable and
> >unknowable in the sense that there is a knower and
> a known, but a metaphysics can be none of these
> things. A metaphysics must be divisible, definable
and
> >knowable, or there isn't any metaphysics. Since a
> >metaphysics is essentially a kind of dialectical
> >definition and since Quality is essentially outside
> >definition, this means that a 'Metaphysics of
> Quality' is essentially a contradiction in terms, a
logical
> >absurdity."
[Marsha]
> Don't you think that is perfect?
Yes.
[SA previously]
> > Isn't static quality, though, the Metaphysics
> of the MoQ, and dynamic quality is the Quality of
the
> >MoQ?
[Marsha]
> Unless you would like me to respond with a quote
> from 'Alice in Wonderland', I think I'll just be
quiet.
Isn't what I said above surmised from the quote
given from Lila?
SA
____________________________________________________________________________________
Need Mail bonding?
Go to the Yahoo! Mail Q&A for great tips from Yahoo! Answers users.
http://answers.yahoo.com/dir/?link=list&sid=396546091
moq_discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
