[Marsha]
> Even though I write affirmative sentences, I am
> quite aware that I
> don't know anything. So an 'in general' agreement
> helps me think I
> might be 'getting it', but then maybe not.
Well, when I said 'in general' in my last post, I
did agree with everything you stated, except the bit
about quality is nothing. Then I went on about a
distinct rock that is innocent and left untouched.
Quality is dq, which is nothing. Quality is also
static, which is something. I perceive quality as dq
and sq. I perceive static quality as dynamic quality
differentiated. Static patterns lead to Truth
sayings. Nothing expresses the bottomless nature of
static patterns. Spov's and dq are quality. Not
different sides of the same coin - the coin is a
static pattern that is undifferentiated from quality.
thanks.
SA
P.S. As to who's 'getting it' I don't know how we
determine this. It is a matter of understanding,
valuing, values leading to understanding,
understanding leading to values, and/or values all the
way, but what values can we rest upon as better than
others - well that is putting too much value in static
patterns, a hardening of static patterns, and a
literalization of static patterns into Truth sayings
where dynamic quality is left out and not included in
the ultimate understanding. This is what I like about
the final picture: Quality.
____________________________________________________________________________________
Want to start your own business?
Learn how on Yahoo! Small Business.
http://smallbusiness.yahoo.com/r-index
moq_discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
