Hi Platt

26 Feb. you wrote:

> Quoting [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
 
> > A Quality outside of MOQ leads to infinite regress.
 
> Not only infinite regress but paradox, recursion and "strange loops." 

Right you are.

> So if MOQ Quality escapes intellect by being outside symbolism and
> definition, how then can we be aware of it other than by silencing our
> chattering minds by meditating? I think Arlo has the answer -- by the
> "pointers" of art, myth and metaphor. Further, one can pay attention
> to her instincts, intuitions and "out-of-the-blue" insights in the
> certain knowledge that understanding can be felt on the pulses as well
> as conceived.

The MOQ is "out of intellect" (in its capacity of being "out of 
SOM") but that doesn't mean the end of symbolism and definition 
(this I take to mean language...or?) I guess it's Pirsig's symbol- 
manipulation definition that causes the conclusion that if MOQ is 
outside intellect it means the end of "symbol manipulation". IMO 
intellect is the S/O and its impact on symbolism is merely 
dividing it into "symbol/what is symbolized".   

Now, intellect's being out of SOM-intellect creates a quasi level-
like relationship between the two and like all levels are built on 
the former levels' patterns  and use them for own purpose, all 
levels - INCLUDED INTELLECT - end up as the base for the 
MOQ and it will use all intellect's patterns for its own purpose. No 
need for meditation - rather for more logical thinking ;-)  

However, the level aspect is only valid to this point, the MOQ is 
all the static levels, but also the Dynamics behind it all, thus Art 
and all the grand concepts we have touched upon during our age-
long discussion - intuition, harmony, meaning, insight - can be 
seen as different facets of Quality.      
   

IMO

Bo
       





moq_discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/

Reply via email to