[Case]
"While GOFC may exist, any set of relationships that occur in it, limit
its freedom. It becomes less dynamic spontaneously and acausally. Or at
least cause and effect emerge as forms of relationship. 

Once you get a set of relatively static relationships going, even a
chaotic system begins to behave deterministically if not predictably.
Harmony, resonance, "equal to" "greater than", "less than", "and", "or",
"nor" are all examples of types of static relationship." 

[Ron]
And the more static relationships the more accurate the value ie,
pragmatically, as Pirsig was 
Aiming with, drawing paralells betweeen the metaphysical system of
Complementarity and the MOQ.
Insofar as terming  "Complementarity" as meaning many truths in using
the value of their average
To arrive at  greater accuracy.


[Ian]
Assuming you were talking chaotic patterns in repeated calculations ?

Interesting, it's an accurate metaphor in the sense that the rounding
limits - in a calculating machine - are properties of the machine that
manifest themselves in the patterns.

ie the patterns are part of physical laws, but they are inherent in the
process of interaction, calculation upon calculation, rather than the
static machine.

The attractors (patterns) exist but they exist in a "strange" dynamic
space.

[ron]
Exactly, the limit is a result of the value to the subject. Just as what
Pirsig was saying about
Bohrs philosophy, it is chaotic nonsense and infinate until observed,
like perception..a limit
Must be set to comprehend and derive any meaning from reality, just like
the rounding limit
As applied to math. If there were no limits to our perception as well as
the application to math,
All that would be percieved is infinate and incomprehenseable and
useless. The rounding limit
Is the mathmatical glimpse of the process of quality.




>
moq_discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/

Reply via email to