[Case]
I know I am beating this dimension thing to death but I don't really get
it either. As I mentioned we can not really even imagine the lower
dimensions without reference to the higher ones. But we can approximate
the higher ones with the lower ones as well. So where are we?
Mandelbrot's fractional dimensions help since it allows us to see that
things exist in as multiple dimensions. I was getting at that a while
back talking about traffic.
In my car the world is all 3D and spacey. Viewed from space my car is a
point on a line.
Now when you start thinking about the future or remembering the past you
are performing a 5th dimensional activity because you are moving back
and forth in time.
{Ron]
Or are you performing a 2 dimentional activity of a 3-d experience? Our
minds seem to be able to
flop back and forth between 2-d and 3-d seemlessly. its what makes
Eschers work seem real because
It exploites this virtually unconscious ability. Is the human mind
linear in a 3-d reality?
Do we ever really exeperience 3-d reality or are we taking 2-d visual
bitmaps and over laying
Them on to a wire form that is part memory and part direct experience?
Why was the roadrunner allways able to travel through the painted tunnel
and the coyote
Could not? I know, it's against the law of physics, but the roadrunner
never studied law.
[Case]
I suspect it all starts with vision in which you construct 3D
understanding out of 2D input. The kinesthetic sense is the only one of
our five senses that actually occurs in 3D. Even sound is a poser since
the sound waves are received sequence.
{ron}
Which brings me back to the [(x)+(x)] analogy with regard to Bohrs
philosphy of complimentarity
Of a limit having to be set by the subject to make use of any input.
What we percieve is a result
Of our minds built in limit(which seems to be variable). The mind
simplifies experience so it is
useful and storable like a computer Using the FAT 32 compression we
recall an experience then inflate
the 2-d memory to 3-d recalled experience. Likewise current experiences
are subject to triggered
Past recall to comprehend and identify it. The (x) factor of reality is
constantly checked by
The (x) factor of perception and wieghed against one another. (x)+(x)
equalls quality?
It would account for usually the most basic and accurate 2-d
representations in art of a 3-d expierience
Is often considered a highter quality of art.
moq_discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
moq_discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
