[IG] Sorry again Ron, but I doubt it - "true / false logic on a firm
foundation of nothingness" ? Where's the drivel fairy when I need him ?
[Ron]
Let me un-drivel it, I'm stating that THAT is what essentialism
does..ex. Existence exists therefore
It's opposite must exist which is nothin-zip...(falsification) ,I think
this is where Ham and Wilbur go wrong
This is what I was trying to explain.
> I think this is where Krimmel battles.
> Pirsigs take on "betterness" seems to be an extension of the theory Of
> "molecular self assembley", rather than a means to an end or an "omega
> point".
[IG] Not sure about the Wilbur take, but to me the omega point is the
last sip of brandy after a last supper in the restaurant at the end of
the universe - the very end - hopefully before the waiter arrives with
the check. To me "ends" are pragmatic things achieved. The Pirsig view
- evolution - reality as self-organising complex systems - is so much
more here and now - real.
[Ron}
I agree. And that is what I'm I'm saying, I feel that beginning, ends,
ultimate destinations,
omega points, ect. Ect.
Are generalized simplifications.
moq_discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
