Arlo,

I'd find your load of shit more believable if you referred to yourself in
the third person to support your "collective consciousness" or at the very
least stop using the word "I".

Micah





<Arlo]
<Of course, and this why the "self" is the dialogic-fusion of the
<bodily-kinesthetic "proprietary" awareness (BKPA) of the individual and the
<"collective consciousness of all mankind" (CCACM).

<My point was that Ham's idea of the "self" being the same thing as one's
<"proprietary awareness" would only be true for an individual left at birth
on a
<deserted island. Although they would lack a concept of "self" as we know it
<(since our "selves" are fusions of BKPA and CCACM), there "awareness" would
be
<strictly proprietary.

<Better said, perhaps, Ham conflates the "self" with BKPA, which is
misguided
<and ignores the inescapable role of the collective (mythos) in the
formation of
<the "self"... while Micah can't stop 69ing Rand long enough to come up for
air
<and see that the whole "Epic Battle" is simply strawman rhetoric.



<[Arlo]
<Not in the sense of this discussion, no, since "self" is a dialogic
construct
<dependent on intersocial cultural assimilation. Like Pirsig restates
Descartes,
<it is not enough to "think" to make "I am", one must preface this event
with
<"so and so culture exists, therefore I think, therefore I am".



moq_discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/

Reply via email to