Arlo, Social Darwinists, Could you elaborate on the kind of "Social Darwinists" you seem to have it in for.
Personally, I'm pretty confortable with neo-Darwinian evolutionary explanations of processes throughout the MoQ levels. Ian On 5/15/07, ARLO J BENSINGER JR <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > [Micah] > So valuing human life and liberty for all is not possible? How and why? > > [Arlo] > I'm sorry, I think you're taking one comment out of context. When I say > "limiting freedom" I refer to restrictions on things such as "murder" or > "rape". We limit these freedoms to achieve greater freedoms. > > Public libraries, in another example, allows us to use taxation to create an > infrastructure where the most people can have access to the most information. > That is maximizing freedom for the greatest number. > > As for valuing human life, as I've said at every turn I certainly do think we > can envision a "society" that values all human life. But the social Darwinists > have been hacking against that for years. > > > moq_discuss mailing list > Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. > http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org > Archives: > http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ > http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/ > moq_discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
