>From: MarshaV <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Reply-To: [email protected]
>To: [email protected]
>Subject: Re: [MD] Social Darwinism
>Date: Sun, 20 May 2007 14:18:53 -0400
>
>
>I have gone so far as to state that Quality is amoral. Both Platt
>and Arlo immediately started throwing quotes at me. I presented the
>water analogy: If everything is water, and there is nothing that is
>not water, then there is no meaning to water, for there is no way of
>distinguishing a duality or difference between water and
>nonwater. It seems to me, if there were a morality to the MoQ, it
>would reside in the 3rd and 4th levels. Do you agree, or not?
Hi Marsha
Everything is water. Would you agree that some water is better than other
water?
Dan
moq_discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
