At 10:19 PM 5/20/2007, you wrote:
> >From: MarshaV <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >Reply-To: [email protected] > >To: [email protected] > >Subject: Re: [MD] Social Darwinism > >Date: Sun, 20 May 2007 14:18:53 -0400 > > > > > >I have gone so far as to state that Quality is amoral. Both Platt > >and Arlo immediately started throwing quotes at me. I presented the > >water analogy: If everything is water, and there is nothing that is > >not water, then there is no meaning to water, for there is no way of > >distinguishing a duality or difference between water and > >nonwater. It seems to me, if there were a morality to the MoQ, it > >would reside in the 3rd and 4th levels. Do you agree, or not? > >Hi Marsha > >Everything is water. Would you agree that some water is better than other >water? > >Dan Dan, No, I couldn't agree. I am the same as everything else (water). I am not separate. Conventionally, I make judgements all the time, but they are statements of misunderstanding. That's that. Marsha moq_discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
