[SA previously]
> > Platt, don't you think that Quality is a
> static pattern, so static that it is a law, but the
> question of 'What is Quality?' still remains, thus,
laws
> may not always work, for instance, isn't it true
that
> > certain laws of physics are currently projected to
> > break down where a black hole exists?
[Platt]
> Quality is not a pattern. Quality is what you know
> before you know patterns.
Yes, I understand this perception exists. I
believe Bo and you state that Quality is dq and static
quality is something different from Quality and dq. I
view Quality as being static and dq, and thus, not
lumping dq with Quality alone. I know we are dead set
in our ways on this, and it really doesn't matter
who's right here on this point, we'll still wake up in
the morning wanting to discuss on the MOQ.org, right?
[Platt]
> As for black holes, their existence is theoretical,
like Darwinian
> evolution. So I can't vouch for the truth of laws
of physics breaking > down where they exist.
Sure, I understand your point of view, and maybe
that's more important than who's right.
thanks.
woods,
SA
____________________________________________________________________________________Ready
for the edge of your seat?
Check out tonight's top picks on Yahoo! TV.
http://tv.yahoo.com/
moq_discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
