At 07:35 AM 5/30/2007, Ron wrote:
> >[Marsha] > >I'm just playing, but does this make any kind of sense? > > > >Everything (good, black, table, me) cannot > > exist without its > > opposite (bad, white, background, you), But that includes > >Everything > > which exists > > from Nothing. > > > >[Ron] > >Lets not forget these things are percieved as opposites..."(good, > >black, table, me)"- subject/object. > >as a matter of definition. Reality is dynamic and infinite, would'nt > >you agree? > > > >[Marsha] > >It's a curious world. I can hardly experience anything without it's >opposite appearing. Even to express an opinion dissolves into awareness >of the opposing view. As far as, "Reality is dynamic and >infinite, wouldn't you agree?", I don't know. Or one moment I know, >the next I know nothing. > >It's the differences and similarities that create a perspective of >reality, wouldn't you agree? > >[ron] > >I agree. As Essentialism states, that is the only way we may know >anything. Hi Ron, I wonder how you could alter this? Ham's thesis was interesting (ignoring the creationist stuff), but probably meditation is the best process. Marsha moq_discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
