Krimel's "point was that Wilber co-opts the whole body of Piagetian research
into his system ignoring the fact that Piaget's system point in a completely
different direction than Wilber's own."
dmb says:
I don't quite understand this objection. Surely, you can't be saying that
Wilber is obliged to remainful to Piaget's intentions? You can't be saying
that Wilber is not allowed to take incorporate ideas and information into
his worldview. What other option do any of us have? If we were obliged to
remain faithful to what's come before, the world of ideas would be frozen
solid. You can't be saying that.
Wilber agrees with Piaget on some things and not on others. So what? Why is
the problem? In what sense is that an "abuse" of ideas? I would think that
sort of thing happens every day, even on weekends and holidays.
dmb
_________________________________________________________________
More photos, more messages, more storageget 2GB with Windows Live Hotmail.
http://imagine-windowslive.com/hotmail/?locale=en-us&ocid=TXT_TAGHM_migration_HM_mini_2G_0507
moq_discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/