Krimel's "point was that Wilber co-opts the whole body of Piagetian research into his system ignoring the fact that Piaget's system point in a completely different direction than Wilber's own."

dmb says:
I don't quite understand this objection. Surely, you can't be saying that Wilber is obliged to remainful to Piaget's intentions? You can't be saying that Wilber is not allowed to take incorporate ideas and information into his worldview. What other option do any of us have? If we were obliged to remain faithful to what's come before, the world of ideas would be frozen solid. You can't be saying that.

Wilber agrees with Piaget on some things and not on others. So what? Why is the problem? In what sense is that an "abuse" of ideas? I would think that sort of thing happens every day, even on weekends and holidays.

dmb

_________________________________________________________________
More photos, more messages, more storage—get 2GB with Windows Live Hotmail. http://imagine-windowslive.com/hotmail/?locale=en-us&ocid=TXT_TAGHM_migration_HM_mini_2G_0507

moq_discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/

Reply via email to